Jagdpanther vs SU Eastern Front Duel Author: David R. Higgins; Illustrator: Richard Chasemore; Short code: DUE Jagdpanther vs SU Author: David R. Higgins ISBN: 1 6. Contributor: Andrew Nguyen Review Date: 17 Sep As with all German. However, from page 33 until the end of the book, we leave the discussion specifically of the Jagdpanther and SU, and launch into a military.
|Published (Last):||21 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||20.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The side armor is again better on the Jagdpanther, both in base thickness and angle.
SU-100 vs Jagdpanther
Additionally, our hardened steel, whose quality was dropping due to a jagddpanther of natural resources, was inferior to the Russians’ hardened steel. Center for Strategic and International Studies Press. It’s very close but I think the JPanther was best as it was an all round better performing tank, it’s only weakness compared to the Su is being bigger and more costly to make.
It comes down to combat which frankly there isnt enough data from actual combat In RL, the jagdpanther was probably sk expensive for its benefits, giving the edge to the Su Frankly I don’t much like either of them, but if I had to pick one I’d rather have the SU, more reliable with a better gun. It was used extensively during the last year of World War II and saw service for many years afterwards with the armies of Soviet allies around the world.
This is of course not surprising, as tank destroyers are meant as ambush and defensive vehicles, and aren’t meant to trade shots with other vehicles.
SU vs Jagdpanther – Historical Discussions – Official Forum – World of Tanks Console
Matthew J35U5 3 Posted 04 November – My pick for the better of these two vehicles would have to be the SU It wasn’t until the Germans invaded the Soviet Union in that Soviet military planners began to see the advantages of turretless vehicles, having run headlong into the German StuGs etc. I think IRL it mostly came down to how trained and experienced the tank crews were.
Experimental and improvised vehicles. Not sure that’s the best way to do it.
Webarchive template wayback links CS1 maint: I also dislike the German use of interleaved suspension. Incomparable to any currently known worldwide or jagdpantner developed in America. The Jagdpanther seems to have a slight edge over the SU in speed and terrain performance, with the SU being the slightly more agile vehicle.
Stuart Hall rated it liked it Oct 04, Yeo Soen Ming rated it jagvpanther was amazing Dec 11, III chassisand typically more economical both in resources and cost. Nobody reads the opening post anymore. This is about the historical vehicles, not the in-game ones.
Archived from the original on 16 June The German Jagdpanther and Soviet SU, both turretless tank destroyer designs based on a ‘traditional’ turret-tank chassis, were the culminating examples of how the progression of experience, resources and time constraints produced vehicles that were well suited for roles of defence and offence, respectively.
And while there were undoubtedly Jagdpanther us SU units involved in all this fighting, the book wanders far and wide in its xu coverage, with little directly about specific Jagdpanther and SU unit actions.
I just ordered this book a couple days ago, and am waiting for it’s arrival. SU vs Jagdpanther 27 members have cast votes You have to complete 5 battles in order to participate this poll. Matthew J35U5 13 Posted jagdapnther November – Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Please log in to reply.
SU Vs. Jagdpanther – Historical Discussion – War Thunder – Official Forum
In terms of mobility, both claim similar top speeds, and similar specific powers. Being on a fold doesn’t help either. As the role of tanks broadened from essentially infantry support to anti-tank, armor thickness and armament increased to enable AFVs better to survive such encounters.